Desktop (hidden)
Responsible packaging for a responsible future
We Make. We Supply. We Deliver
Tablet & Mobile (hidden)
DeliStore - Updated
Free Shipping For Orders Over £79 ex VAT.
Order By 1pm Monday-Friday For Same Day Dispatch.
SUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONS
INDUSTRY KNOWLEDGE
FAST SHIPPING
LOW MOQ
What GSM really tells you, how leak-proof differs from leak-resistant, which strength tests matter and how to choose a container that can handle the journey.
A takeaway container has a difficult job. It leaves a warm kitchen full of fresh food, gets stacked beside three other orders, travels over speed bumps and round corners, then waits on a doorstep in the British weather.
By the time it reaches the customer, it may have been tilted, squeezed and exposed to heat, steam, oil and sauce. The customer sees only the result. A crisp box, secure lid and properly presented meal feel effortless. A softened base or leaking corner does not.
That is why choosing food packaging by appearance and price alone can be a costly shortcut. The details on a specification sheet help predict how a pack will behave in service.
Food packaging strength is the result of several factors working together, not one impressive-looking number.
GSM matters, but it is only one part of the answer. A well-engineered lower-GSM container may perform better than a heavier board with weak folds, a poor coating or an unsuitable lid.
GSM stands for grams per square metre. It is the grammage, or mass per unit area, of paper or board. A square metre of 300 GSM board weighs 300 grams.
The formal method for determining paper and board grammage is set out in ISO 536. In everyday buying, GSM gives you a useful indication of how much paper or board is present. It does not directly measure thickness, stiffness, compression strength or leak resistance.
Often, but not always. If two packs use the same material, construction and coating, the higher-GSM version will usually feel more substantial and may resist bending better. In the real world, packs are rarely identical in every other respect.
Strength also depends on fibre composition, thickness, density, shape, moisture exposure, barrier coating and closure design. Corrugated packs gain much of their strength from their layered structure. Ribs, folded corners and curved walls can add rigidity without simply adding more material.
Think of GSM as one clue, not a quality score. If a supplier promotes a high GSM without explaining the material, construction or intended use, the specification is incomplete.
The terms sound similar, but they set different expectations.
Designed to reduce the escape of liquid during normal handling. It may cope with moist foods, dressings or short journeys while upright, but should not be assumed to contain free-flowing liquid in every position.
Presented as providing a higher level of containment when correctly closed and used within stated conditions. The food, fill temperature, holding time, lid fit and test method still matter.
There is no useful universal promise that every pack described as leak-proof will remain sealed indefinitely when inverted, overfilled or used outside its temperature range. Test conditions matter.
A simple in-kitchen trial is worthwhile even when supplier data is available. A curry, dressed salad and portion of chips place very different demands on a container.
Water, oil and steam interact with packaging in different ways. A paper or board pack may resist a splash of water but allow oil to wick through over time. Another may hold fatty food effectively but soften when trapped steam condenses.
Grease resistance is particularly important for burgers, fried chicken, chips, pastries, pizza, sauced wraps and oily salads.
The paper industry often measures oil and grease resistance using a kit test, such as TAPPI T 559. Increasingly aggressive test solutions are applied to the material. The result indicates surface repellency under the method's conditions, but does not automatically predict the performance of a finished box with folds, cut edges and seams.
Do not ask only, “Is it grease-resistant?” Ask, “Will it resist this food, at this temperature, for this long?”
Laboratory methods create repeatable comparisons. Service trials show how the pack behaves in your operation. The strongest buying decision uses both.
Checks whether liquid or gas escapes through the material, a seam, a closure or the junction between lid and base. Useful results state the test liquid, fill, temperature, orientation, duration and pass criteria.
Simulates shocks during packing, handover and delivery. A filled pack is dropped from a defined height, then checked for lid release, cracking, splitting, deformation or product loss.
Measures behaviour under load. It reveals whether packs at the bottom of a stack may buckle, collapse or transfer pressure to the food, particularly after exposure to warm moisture.
Checks stability at a stated temperature for a stated time, including distortion, lid fit, seal integrity, delamination and suitability for hot filling or reheating.
“Hot food friendly” and “microwave safe” are not the same claim. A pack may accept hot food from the kitchen but be unsuitable for reheating. Microwave suitability does not imply conventional oven suitability. Always follow the stated time and temperature limits.
A good specification sheet should help you answer one question: is this pack suitable for my food and my service journey?
Look for the specific material, such as kraft board, corrugated board, bagasse, PET, RPET, PP or aluminium. Material affects rigidity, barrier performance, temperature suitability and end-of-life options.
Check whether dimensions are internal or external and whether capacity is brimful or the recommended fill. Compare top and base dimensions, height, compartment capacity and the headspace available.
Paper and board may show GSM. Films and plastics may use thickness or gauge. Treat the figure as a comparison point within similar products, not a standalone measure of strength.
Check for a lining or treatment for grease, moisture or heat. Find out whether it covers the full food-contact surface and whether folds, seams or exposed edges remain vulnerable.
Look for minimum and maximum temperatures plus any time limit. Hot fill, hot holding, microwave reheating, oven use, chilled storage and freezer storage are separate conditions.
Match the exact lid code, size and material. Check whether it is snap-fit, hinged, tab-lock or film-sealed, whether it is vented and whether it shares the base's temperature range.
Confirm that the packaging is intended for food contact and request supporting documents where needed. Claims such as recyclable, compostable, microwave safe or freezer safe should be explicit.
Check units per sleeve and case, whether lids are separate, nested stack height, case dimensions, storage conditions and minimum order quantity. Stockroom space affects operational cost too.
| Food type | Priority specifications | Why they matter |
|---|---|---|
| Soups, curries and stews | Secure lid, tested leak performance, hot-fill limit, headspace | Free-flowing liquid and heat place pressure on rims, seams and closures. |
| Burgers and fried food | Grease resistance, steam management, rigidity, ventilation | Oil and trapped steam can soften board and reduce crispness. |
| Chips and loaded fries | Grease resistance, venting, portion capacity, base strength | Heat, oil and heavy toppings affect both food quality and structure. |
| Salads and cold deli food | Leak resistance, chilled suitability, dressing compatibility | Dressings can migrate through weak seals and oily ingredients challenge barriers. |
| Pasta and rice dishes | Compression strength, moisture resistance, lid security | Portions are often heavy, hot and stacked for delivery. |
| Pizza | Board stiffness, grease resistance, ventilation, stack strength | The box must protect the topping without trapping excessive steam. |
| Cakes and pastries | Internal dimensions, base rigidity, grease resistance, clearance | Presentation and product clearance matter more than liquid containment. |
| Sandwiches and wraps | Moisture resistance, fit, closure security, visibility | A close fit limits movement while a suitable barrier reduces staining. |
| Cold drinks | Cup material, brim capacity, lid diameter, sip format | Cup and lid compatibility is critical during movement. |
| Hot drinks | Temperature suitability, wall construction, lid fit, fill line | Heat handling and a secure lid shape the customer experience. |
Specification sheets narrow the shortlist. Your own menu completes the test.
Repeat the trial with the hardest menu item, not the easiest. If a range includes a dry side and a hot oily main, test the main.
There is no single strongest food container. A very rigid pack may trap too much steam. A highly vented box may be wrong for a saucy dish. A high-GSM board may still fail if its coating does not suit hot oil. A lid that feels secure when cold may behave differently after hot filling.
Good packaging selection starts with the complete journey: filling, closing, holding, stacking, transport and opening. GSM, leak claims and test results are tools for understanding that journey, not substitutes for it.
GSM stands for grams per square metre. It measures the mass per unit area of paper or board. It can help compare similar materials, but does not directly measure the strength of a finished food container.
Is higher GSM always better for food packaging?No. Higher GSM often means more material, but performance also depends on fibre type, thickness, shape, folds, coatings, moisture exposure and lid fit. Compare like with like and test the complete pack.
What is the difference between leak-proof and leak-resistant?Leak-resistant packaging is designed to limit leakage during normal use. Leak-proof suggests a higher level of containment, but the claim is meaningful only when the liquid, temperature, duration, fill level and orientation are known.
How is food packaging tested for leaks?Methods vary by format. A finished container may be filled and held upright, tilted or inverted for a set time. Flexible packs may use vacuum bubble, pressure or dye-based methods. The base and closure should be tested together.
What packaging is best for hot and oily food?Look for stated hot-food suitability, grease resistance, enough rigidity for the portion and the right ventilation. Test it using the actual food because temperature, oil, steam and holding time interact.
Does microwave safe mean oven safe?No. Microwave and conventional oven suitability are separate claims. Use packaging only within the time and temperature conditions stated by the manufacturer or supplier.
What should be on a packaging specification sheet?It should identify the material, dimensions, capacity, weight or gauge, barrier or coating, temperature limits, compatible lids, food-contact status, case quantity and any verified performance or disposal claims.